home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.java,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.smalltalk
- Path: news.hawaii.edu!phinely
- From: phinely@Hawaii.Edu (Peter Hinely)
- Subject: Re: Will Java kill C++?
- X-Nntp-Posting-Host: uhunix4.its.hawaii.edu
- Message-ID: <Dq0poC.3Iy@news.hawaii.edu>
- Sender: news@news.hawaii.edu
- Organization: University of Hawaii
- References: <3134D499.653E@ix.netcom.com> <4ku8rq$pav@cubenx.cube.de> <goochb.340.00156E50@rwi.com> <BLUME.96Apr16103345@zayin.cs.princeton.edu>
- Date: Wed, 17 Apr 1996 17:53:00 GMT
-
- In article <BLUME.96Apr16103345@zayin.cs.princeton.edu>,
- Matthias Blume <blume@zayin.cs.princeton.edu> wrote:
- >In article <goochb.340.00156E50@rwi.com> goochb@rwi.com (William D. Gooch) writes:
- >
- > I do think there's a serious lack of adequate instruction on
- > the proper use of MI. Perhaps this can be rectified.
- >
- >The only kind of `adequate' instruction on the `proper use' of MI is:
- >
- > DON'T!
- >
- >BTW, there are people who think that *inheritance* is a bad idea
- >already. MI is only taking a bad idea to the extreme...
- >
-
- There are people that think *computers* are a bad idea.
-
- Perhaps you could elaborate a little more why you/they think
- inheritance/multiple inheritance is a bad idea.
-
-